tool: was important to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to humans 1.00
be important to humans 0.97
was important to early humans 0.94
be important for human beings 0.84
be important for human being 0.83
be important for beings 0.82
be necessary for human beings 0.81
be important to people 0.80
be important to human survival 0.79
be necessary for beings 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to human survival)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(resource, be necessary for human beings)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(resource, be necessary for beings)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(resource, be necessary for human beings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(resource, be necessary for beings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to human survival)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to humans)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to human survival)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for human being)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to people)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(resource, be necessary for human beings)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(resource, be necessary for beings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to human survival)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(resource, be necessary for human beings)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(resource, be necessary for beings)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tool, was important to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tool, was important to early humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tool, was important to early humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to early humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(resource, be necessary for human beings)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(resource, be necessary for beings)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to human survival)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(resource, be necessary for human beings)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(resource, be necessary for beings)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to human survival)