tool: were helpful to early people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
were helpful to early people 1.00
were helpful to people 0.96
is helpful 0.86
were important to hunters-gatherers 0.84
be important to people 0.83
was important to early humans 0.82
was different from people 0.81
was different from other people 0.81
be useful 0.79
be useful doing 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(method, was different from people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(method, was different from people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to people)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, is helpful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, is helpful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be useful doing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(method, was different from people)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metaphor, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(metaphor, is helpful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spreadsheet, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, is helpful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be useful doing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be useful doing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(calculator, be useful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(calculator, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(tool, were helpful to early people)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tool, were helpful to people)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tool, was important to early humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tool, be useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tool, be useful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tool, was important to early humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(tool, be useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to early humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(method, was different from people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be useful doing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metaphor, is helpful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, is helpful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calculator, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(method, was different from people)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)