tool: were helpful to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
were helpful to people 1.00
were helpful to early people 0.96
is helpful 0.91
be important to people 0.85
were important to hunters-gatherers 0.83
be useful 0.83
is useful 0.82
be useful doing 0.82
was different from other people 0.81
was different from people 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mechanism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(method, was different from people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(method, was different from people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mechanism, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to people)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from people)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, is helpful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, is helpful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be useful doing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mechanism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(method, was different from people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metaphor, is helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(metaphor, is helpful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spreadsheet, is helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, is helpful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be useful doing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be useful doing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(spreadsheet, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(metaphor, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(metaphor, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(calculator, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(calculator, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tool, were helpful to people)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tool, be useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tool, be useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(tool, be useful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, be useful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(method, was different from people)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mechanism, is useful)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be useful doing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(metaphor, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metaphor, is helpful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calculator, be useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, is helpful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(method, was different from people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mechanism, is useful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)