tool: work on new album

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
work on new album 1.00
work on album 0.98
be used in songs 0.80
write own songs 0.77
write songs 0.77
is good band 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, be used in songs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(metaphor, be used in songs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(metaphor, be used in songs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tool, work on new album)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tool, write own songs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tool, write own songs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(tool, write own songs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tool, write own songs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tool, is good band)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tool, is good band)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tool, is good band)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(tool, is good band)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tool, work on new album)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tool, work on new album)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tool, work on new album) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(metaphor, be used in songs)