tooth decay: be diagnosed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.65
, disease
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, tooth
Weight: 0.60
Siblings wisdom tooth
Weight: 0.38
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.36
, decay
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be diagnosed 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(disease, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tooth decay, be diagnosed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(disease, be diagnosed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(disease, be diagnosed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(macular degeneration, be diagnosed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be diagnosed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(disease, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tooth decay, be diagnosed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(macular degeneration, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(macular degeneration, be diagnosed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(tooth decay, be diagnosed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be diagnosed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tooth decay, be diagnosed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(disease, be diagnosed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(macular degeneration, be diagnosed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tooth decay, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(disease, be diagnosed)