tooth decay: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.65
, disease
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, tooth
Weight: 0.60
Siblings wisdom tooth
Weight: 0.38
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.36
, decay
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tooth decay, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tooth, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(decay, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(decay, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tooth decay, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tooth decay, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tooth, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wisdom tooth, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(decay, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tooth decay, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tooth, has quality bad)