tooth: pain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tooth decay
Weight: 0.65
, tissue
Weight: 0.61
, object
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wisdom tooth
Weight: 0.74
, jaw
Weight: 0.59
, molar
Weight: 0.53
, x ray
Weight: 0.51
, fang
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
pain 1.00
has state pain 0.93
ache at night 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(jaw, has state pain)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jaw, pain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(jaw, pain)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(jaw, pain)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(jaw, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(jaw, has state pain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tooth, pain)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tooth, has state pain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tooth, ache at night)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tooth, has state pain)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tooth, has state pain)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tooth, ache at night)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tooth, has state pain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tooth, ache at night)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tooth, ache at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tooth, pain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tooth, pain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(jaw, pain)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tooth, pain)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(jaw, has state pain)