top floor: be hot in summer

Related concepts

Parents	floor Weight: 0.82 , time Weight: 0.57 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.56 , door Weight: 0.55
Siblings	second floor Weight: 0.42 , balcony Weight: 0.36 , basement Weight: 0.35 , ceiling Weight: 0.34 , front door Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be hot in summer	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(top floor, be hot in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(basement, be hot in summer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(top floor, be hot in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(basement, be hot in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(basement, be hot in summer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(top floor, be hot in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(top floor, be hot in summer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(top floor, be hot in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(top floor, be hot in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(top floor, be hot in summer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.07

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(top floor, be hot in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(top floor, be hot in summer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(top floor, be hot in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(basement, be hot in summer)