top: be down processing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bottom
Weight: 0.66
, title
Weight: 0.63
, view
Weight: 0.58
, table
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tank top
Weight: 0.68
, champion
Weight: 0.32
, picnic table
Weight: 0.32
, major
Weight: 0.31
, hash table
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be down processing 1.00
be up processing correct 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bottom, be up processing correct)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(top, be down processing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bottom, be up processing correct)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bottom, be up processing correct)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bottom, be up processing correct)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(top, be down processing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(top, be down processing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(top, be down processing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(top, be down processing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bottom, be up processing correct)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(top, be down processing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bottom, be up processing correct)