top: be passive at high level of play

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bottom
Weight: 0.66
, title
Weight: 0.63
, view
Weight: 0.58
, table
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tank top
Weight: 0.68
, champion
Weight: 0.32
, picnic table
Weight: 0.32
, major
Weight: 0.31
, hash table
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be passive at high level of play 1.00
be passive at level of play 0.98
be passive at high level 0.98
be passive at level 0.96
is high 0.79
has degree low 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(view, has degree low) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(top, be passive at high level of play)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bottom, has degree low) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(top, be passive at high level of play)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bottom, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(top, be passive at high level of play)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bottom, is high)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bottom, has degree low)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(view, has degree low)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bottom, is high)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(bottom, has degree low)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(view, has degree low)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(view, has degree low) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bottom, has degree low) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bottom, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(top, be passive at high level of play)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(top, be passive at level of play)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at level of play)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(top, be passive at level of play)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at level)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(top, be passive at high level)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at high level)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(top, be passive at level)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(top, be passive at high level)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(top, is high)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(top, be passive at high level)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(top, be passive at level)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(top, is high)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(top, be passive at level of play)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(top, be passive at level)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(top, is high)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(top, is high)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(top, be passive at high level of play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bottom, is high)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bottom, has degree low)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(view, has degree low)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bottom, is high)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bottom, has degree low)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(top, be passive at high level of play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(view, has degree low)