topology: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, architecture
Weight: 0.54
, field
Weight: 0.52
Siblings daisy chain
Weight: 0.61
, loop
Weight: 0.56
, metric space
Weight: 0.53
, configuration
Weight: 0.34
, parameter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
is good major 0.78
is good job 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(topology, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(architecture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(topology, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(topology, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(architecture, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(topology, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(architecture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(topology, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(architecture, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(architecture, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(architecture, is good job)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(architecture, is good major)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(architecture, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(architecture, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(daisy chain, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(daisy chain, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(loop, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(daisy chain, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(topology, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(architecture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(topology, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(topology, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(architecture, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(topology, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(architecture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(topology, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(daisy chain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(daisy chain, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(loop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(loop, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(daisy chain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(daisy chain, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(daisy chain, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(daisy chain, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(topology, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(topology, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architecture, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(architecture, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(architecture, is good job)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(architecture, is good major)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(daisy chain, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(daisy chain, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(daisy chain, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(loop, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(architecture, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architecture, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(architecture, is good major)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(topology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(architecture, is good job)