toronto: be called toronto good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.57
, event
Weight: 0.56
, canada
Weight: 0.56
, city
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.66
, ontario
Weight: 0.56
, montreal
Weight: 0.36
, quebec city
Weight: 0.35
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called toronto good 1.00
be called toronto 0.98
is toronto 0.96
be named toronto 0.94
was named toronto 0.93
is pronounced toronto 0.91
be better than montreal 0.84
be better than vancouver 0.81
be canadian team in mlb 0.80
be important to ontario 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, be important to ontario)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ottawa, be important to ontario)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ottawa, be important to ontario)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(toronto, be called toronto)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(toronto, was named toronto)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(toronto, be named toronto)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(toronto, is pronounced toronto)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(toronto, be called toronto)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(toronto, be called toronto)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(toronto, was named toronto)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(toronto, is pronounced toronto)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(toronto, be named toronto)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(toronto, be named toronto)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(toronto, was named toronto)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(toronto, is pronounced toronto)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(toronto, be better than montreal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(toronto, be better than montreal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be named toronto)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(toronto, be better than vancouver)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(toronto, be better than vancouver)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(toronto, be better than montreal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(toronto, was named toronto)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be canadian team in mlb)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(toronto, be canadian team in mlb)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is pronounced toronto)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(toronto, be better than vancouver)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(toronto, be important to ontario)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be better than montreal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be important to ontario)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be better than vancouver)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toronto, be important to ontario)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(toronto, be important to ontario)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(toronto, be canadian team in mlb)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(toronto, be canadian team in mlb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ottawa, be important to ontario)