tort: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents common law
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, wrong
Weight: 0.52
Siblings libel
Weight: 0.66
, litigation
Weight: 0.34
, court case
Weight: 0.32
, indemnity
Weight: 0.32
, lawsuit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality right 0.88
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
was wrong jesus 0.78
is civil wrong 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(common law, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(wrong, was wrong jesus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wrong, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(common law, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(wrong, has quality right)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(wrong, was wrong jesus)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wrong, has quality right)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wrong, was wrong jesus)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(common law, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tort, has quality wrong)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wrong, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tort, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(common law, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tort, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tort, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(wrong, was wrong jesus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tort, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(libel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(libel, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(libel, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tort, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tort, is civil wrong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tort, is civil wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tort, is civil wrong)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tort, is civil wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(wrong, has quality right)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(common law, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(common law, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wrong, was wrong jesus)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(common law, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(libel, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(libel, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(wrong, has quality right)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(common law, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(common law, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wrong, was wrong jesus)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(common law, has quality good)