torture: be violation of rights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.67
, evil
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.61
, punishment
Weight: 0.60
Siblings waterboarding
Weight: 0.68
, whipping
Weight: 0.44
, genocide
Weight: 0.36
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34
, terrorism
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be violation of rights 1.00
is rights violation 1.00
be violation of human rights 0.97
is human rights violation 0.97
be violation of law 0.92
be violation of criminal law 0.87
be violation of us constitution 0.86
is rights issue 0.81
be against rights 0.80
is human rights issue 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be violation of law)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be violation of criminal law)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(terrorism, be violation of law)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be violation of law)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(terrorism, be violation of criminal law)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be violation of criminal law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(torture, be violation of rights)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(torture, is rights violation)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(torture, is rights violation)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(torture, be violation of human rights)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(torture, is human rights violation)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(torture, is human rights violation)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(torture, be violation of human rights)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(torture, be violation of us constitution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(torture, is rights violation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(torture, is rights issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(torture, be violation of human rights)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(torture, be violation of human rights)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(torture, is human rights violation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(torture, is rights issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(torture, is rights violation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(torture, is human rights issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(torture, is rights issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(torture, is rights issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(torture, is human rights violation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(torture, is human rights issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(torture, is human rights issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(torture, is human rights issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(torture, be violation of us constitution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(torture, be violation of us constitution)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(torture, be violation of us constitution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(torture, be violation of rights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(terrorism, be violation of law)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(torture, be violation of rights)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(terrorism, be violation of criminal law)