torture: was considered method uncovering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.67
, evil
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.61
, punishment
Weight: 0.60
Siblings waterboarding
Weight: 0.68
, whipping
Weight: 0.44
, genocide
Weight: 0.36
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34
, terrorism
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was considered method uncovering 1.00
was considered acceptable method uncovering 0.96
acceptable method uncovering 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(torture, was considered method uncovering)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(torture, was considered acceptable method uncovering)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(torture, acceptable method uncovering)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(torture, was considered acceptable method uncovering)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(torture, acceptable method uncovering)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(torture, was considered acceptable method uncovering)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(torture, acceptable method uncovering)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(torture, was considered acceptable method uncovering)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(torture, acceptable method uncovering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(torture, was considered method uncovering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(torture, was considered method uncovering)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(torture, was considered method uncovering)