tory: has physical part wing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.47
, place
Weight: 0.43
, conservative party
Weight: 0.42
, thing
Weight: 0.41
, name
Weight: 0.40
Siblings liberal party
Weight: 0.32
, ndp
Weight: 0.31
, pdp
Weight: 0.31
, democratic party
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part wing 1.00
be called wing 0.91
is right wing 0.91
be called right wing 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tory, has physical part wing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(conservative party, be called right wing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tory, has physical part wing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(conservative party, be called right wing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(conservative party, be called wing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be called wing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be called right wing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(liberal party, has physical part wing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(liberal party, is right wing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ndp, has physical part wing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(conservative party, be called right wing)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(ndp, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ndp, has physical part wing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(liberal party, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(liberal party, has physical part wing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(liberal party, is right wing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(liberal party, is right wing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(tory, has physical part wing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tory, is right wing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tory, is right wing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tory, is right wing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tory, be called wing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tory, is right wing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tory, be called wing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tory, be called right wing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tory, be called right wing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tory, be called wing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tory, be called right wing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tory, be called right wing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tory, be called wing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tory, has physical part wing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(conservative party, be called wing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(conservative party, be called right wing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ndp, has physical part wing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(liberal party, has physical part wing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(liberal party, is right wing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(conservative party, be called wing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tory, has physical part wing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(conservative party, be called right wing)