toshiba: be good hard drive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.61
, company
Weight: 0.61
, brand
Weight: 0.60
, laptop
Weight: 0.55
Siblings motorola
Weight: 0.34
, philips
Weight: 0.34
, ipad
Weight: 0.34
, nintendo
Weight: 0.34
, thinkpad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good hard drive 1.00
be good drive 0.95
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(laptop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(toshiba, be good hard drive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(toshiba, be good hard drive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(laptop, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(laptop, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(thinkpad, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(laptop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(thinkpad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(thinkpad, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(toshiba, be good hard drive)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(toshiba, be good drive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(toshiba, be good drive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, be good drive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(toshiba, be good drive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toshiba, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(toshiba, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(toshiba, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(toshiba, be good hard drive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(laptop, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thinkpad, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(toshiba, be good hard drive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(laptop, has quality good)