tourist: be at waterfall

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents visitor
Weight: 0.60
, other person
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.50
, part
Weight: 0.50
, photographer
Weight: 0.49
Siblings policeman
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.31
, old man
Weight: 0.31
, fisherman
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at waterfall 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(photographer, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tourist, be at waterfall)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(photographer, be at waterfall)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(photographer, be at waterfall)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(photographer, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tourist, be at waterfall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(tourist, be at waterfall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be at waterfall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tourist, be at waterfall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(photographer, be at waterfall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tourist, be at waterfall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(photographer, be at waterfall)