tourist: be attracted to antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents visitor
Weight: 0.60
, other people
Weight: 0.53
, site
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business people
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.32
, amusement park
Weight: 0.31
, young people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attracted to antarctica 1.00
be attracted to burren 0.90
get to antarctica 0.81
be attracted to niagara 0.81
be attracted to cities 0.80
be attracted to kenya 0.79
go to antarctica 0.76
be attracted to coastal areas 0.76
be attracted to paris 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(visitor, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(visitor, go to antarctica)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(visitor, go to antarctica)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(visitor, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to cities)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tourist, be attracted to cities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tourist, go to antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tourist, go to antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tourist, go to antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to paris)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tourist, be attracted to cities)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tourist, be attracted to paris)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tourist, be attracted to paris)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tourist, go to antarctica)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to paris)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to cities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(visitor, go to antarctica)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(visitor, go to antarctica)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)