tourist: go to antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents visitor
Weight: 0.60
, other people
Weight: 0.53
, site
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business people
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.32
, amusement park
Weight: 0.31
, young people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
go to antarctica 1.00
get to antarctica 0.94
affect environment in antarctica 0.80
be attracted to antarctica 0.76
go majorca 0.76
go to carcassonne 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(visitor, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tourist, go to antarctica)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(visitor, go to antarctica)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(visitor, go to antarctica)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(visitor, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tourist, go to antarctica)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tourist, go to antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tourist, go to antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tourist, go to antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(visitor, go to antarctica)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tourist, go to antarctica)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(visitor, go to antarctica)