tourist: have impact on antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents visitor
Weight: 0.60
, other people
Weight: 0.53
, site
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business people
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.32
, amusement park
Weight: 0.31
, young people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have impact on antarctica 1.00
affect environment in antarctica 0.84
affect on environment 0.78
have minimum affect on antarctica 0.78
get to antarctica 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tourist, have impact on antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tourist, affect on environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tourist, affect on environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(tourist, affect on environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tourist, get to antarctica)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tourist, affect on environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, have impact on antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tourist, have impact on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tourist, have impact on antarctica)