tower: be is looked after today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.73
, control tower
Weight: 0.70
, project
Weight: 0.65
, structure
Weight: 0.63
Siblings clock tower
Weight: 0.77
, cn tower
Weight: 0.68
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.42
, apartment building
Weight: 0.36
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be is looked after today 1.00
be is looked 0.93
were needed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, were needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tower, be is looked after today)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tower, be is looked)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tower, be is looked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tower, be is looked)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tower, be is looked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tower, be is looked after today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tower, be is looked after today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tower, be is looked after today)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(skyscraper, were needed)