tower: stand tall

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.73
, control tower
Weight: 0.70
, project
Weight: 0.65
, structure
Weight: 0.63
Siblings clock tower
Weight: 0.77
, cn tower
Weight: 0.68
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.42
, apartment building
Weight: 0.36
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
stand tall 1.00
be tall 199 feet 0.89
be hit tall 0.88
has size tall 0.87
be hit ridiculously tall 0.82
be taller in cbd 0.79
be in york tall 0.79
be in new york tall 0.78
be in kong tall 0.77
be in hong tall 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(building, has size tall)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tower, stand tall)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(building, has size tall)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(building, has size tall)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cn tower, has size tall)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, has size tall)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(building, has size tall)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tower, stand tall)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skyscraper, has size tall)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, has size tall)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cn tower, has size tall)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cn tower, has size tall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(tower, stand tall)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tower, be tall 199 feet)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tower, has size tall)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tower, be hit ridiculously tall)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tower, be tall 199 feet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tower, be tall 199 feet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tower, be hit ridiculously tall)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tower, be hit ridiculously tall)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tower, has size tall)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(tower, has size tall)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tower, be hit ridiculously tall)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tower, be tall 199 feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tower, has size tall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tower, stand tall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tower, stand tall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(building, has size tall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(skyscraper, has size tall)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cn tower, has size tall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tower, stand tall)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(building, has size tall)