town: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.69
, community
Weight: 0.69
, school district
Weight: 0.64
, council
Weight: 0.64
Siblings village
Weight: 0.76
, quebec city
Weight: 0.76
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at ohio 0.88
be at utah 0.86
be at germany 0.77
be at country of france 0.76
be at state of new york 0.76
be at africa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(village, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(village, be at ohio)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(city, be at germany)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(village, be at country of france)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(village, be at africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be at state of new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(village, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(village, be at michigan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(village, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(village, be at ohio)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(village, be at country of france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(village, be at country of france)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(city, be at germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(city, be at germany)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(village, be at africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(village, be at africa)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new york city, be at state of new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york city, be at state of new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(town, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(town, be at utah)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(town, be at utah)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(town, be at utah)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(town, be at utah)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(town, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(village, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(village, be at ohio)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new york city, be at state of new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(village, be at africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(village, be at country of france)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(city, be at germany)