town: be used to person to visit from another town

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.69
, community
Weight: 0.69
, school district
Weight: 0.64
, council
Weight: 0.64
Siblings village
Weight: 0.76
, quebec city
Weight: 0.76
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to person to visit from another town 1.00
be part of town 0.82
be used to person to work in 0.77
be used to person to live in 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to visit from another town)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(area, be part of town)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(village, be used to person to live in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(town, be used to person to visit from another town)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(village, be used to person to live in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(village, be used to person to live in)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(town, be used to person to visit from another town)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(town, be used to person to work in)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to live in)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to work in)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(town, be used to person to work in)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to live in)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to work in)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(town, be used to person to live in)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(town, be used to person to live in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to visit from another town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(area, be part of town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(village, be used to person to live in)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(area, be part of town)