town: develop near rivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents municipality
Weight: 0.69
, area
Weight: 0.69
, community
Weight: 0.69
, school district
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.64
Siblings village
Weight: 0.76
, city
Weight: 0.73
, town square
Weight: 0.72
, borough
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
develop near rivers 1.00
devlope near rivers 0.95
be built near rivers 0.94
be built by rivers 0.89
were established near river 0.87
be located on river 0.83
is built in watersheds 0.80
be located near bodies of water 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(city, develop near rivers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near bodies of water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(city, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(city, develop near rivers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(city, be located on river)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(city, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(city, be located near bodies of water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(town, develop near rivers)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(town, be built near rivers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(town, be built near rivers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(town, be built near rivers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(town, be built near rivers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, be built by rivers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(town, be built by rivers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(town, be built by rivers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(town, be built by rivers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(town, be located on river)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(town, is built in watersheds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(town, be located on river)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(town, were established near river)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(town, be located on river)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(town, is built in watersheds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(town, be located on river)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(town, is built in watersheds)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(town, is built in watersheds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(town, were established near river)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(town, were established near river)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(town, develop near rivers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(city, develop near rivers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be located near bodies of water)