town: were established near river

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents municipality
Weight: 0.69
, area
Weight: 0.69
, community
Weight: 0.69
, school district
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.64
Siblings village
Weight: 0.76
, city
Weight: 0.73
, town square
Weight: 0.72
, borough
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
were established near river 1.00
be built near rivers 0.90
be located on river 0.89
develop near rivers 0.87
devlope near rivers 0.87
be built by rivers 0.84
be located near bodies of water 0.83
be located near bodies 0.80
be located by body of water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(city, develop near rivers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near bodies)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be located by body of water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(city, be located on river)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(city, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(city, develop near rivers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(city, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(city, be located near bodies)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(city, be located near bodies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(city, be located by body of water)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be located by body of water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(town, were established near river)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(town, be built near rivers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(town, be built near rivers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(town, be built near rivers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(town, be located on river)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(town, develop near rivers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(town, be located on river)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(town, be built near rivers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(town, be built by rivers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(town, be located on river)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, be built by rivers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(town, be located on river)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(town, be built by rivers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(town, develop near rivers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(town, be located near bodies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(town, be built by rivers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(town, be located near bodies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(town, be located by body of water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(town, be located by body of water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(town, be located by body of water)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(town, be located by body of water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(town, were established near river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(city, develop near rivers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(city, be located near bodies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(city, be located by body of water)