toyota: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.64
, car
Weight: 0.61
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ferrari
Weight: 0.36
, volvo
Weight: 0.36
, nissan
Weight: 0.36
, pontiac
Weight: 0.35
, bmw
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be park in car park 0.96
be park in park lot 0.95
be at car park 0.91
be at park garage 0.90
be park in garage 0.89
be at park lot 0.89
be used to drive to park 0.89
be find in park lot 0.86
be park in garage not office 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(car, be at car park)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toyota, be at park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(car, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toyota, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(car, be at park lot)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(car, be at car park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(car, be at park lot)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(car, be at car park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(car, be at car park)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(toyota, be at park)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(car, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(toyota, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(toyota, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toyota, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(car, be at car park)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(car, be at park lot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(car, be at car park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(toyota, be at park)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(car, be at park lot)