toyota: be recognised as competitor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.64
, car
Weight: 0.61
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mercedes benz
Weight: 0.65
, corolla
Weight: 0.54
, ferrari
Weight: 0.36
, hyundai
Weight: 0.36
, subaru
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be recognised as competitor 1.00
be recognised as competitor to volkswagen 0.94
be competitor to volkswagen 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hyundai, be competitor to volkswagen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hyundai, be competitor to volkswagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hyundai, be competitor to volkswagen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(toyota, be recognised as competitor)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(toyota, be competitor to volkswagen)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(toyota, be competitor to volkswagen)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(toyota, be competitor to volkswagen)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(toyota, be recognised as competitor to volkswagen)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(toyota, be recognised as competitor to volkswagen)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(toyota, be recognised as competitor to volkswagen)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be competitor to volkswagen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be recognised as competitor to volkswagen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be recognised as competitor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(toyota, be recognised as competitor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be recognised as competitor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hyundai, be competitor to volkswagen)