toyota: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.64
, car
Weight: 0.61
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mercedes benz
Weight: 0.65
, corolla
Weight: 0.54
, ferrari
Weight: 0.36
, hyundai
Weight: 0.36
, subaru
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality worth 0.83
has quality organization 0.78
be cheaper than competition lately 0.78
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(subaru, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(subaru, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ferrari, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mercedes benz, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ferrari, is best)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(subaru, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(subaru, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ferrari, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ferrari, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(subaru, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(subaru, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ferrari, is best)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ferrari, is best)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(subaru, is best)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(subaru, is best)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mercedes benz, is best)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mercedes benz, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(toyota, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(toyota, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(toyota, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(toyota, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(toyota, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality worth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(toyota, is best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ferrari, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(subaru, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(subaru, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ferrari, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(subaru, is best)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mercedes benz, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(toyota, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)