trachoma: disease of poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.56
, disease
Weight: 0.54
, condition
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.42
, eye
Weight: 0.31
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.35
, malaria
Weight: 0.34
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.34
, measles
Weight: 0.34
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
disease of poverty 1.00
be considered disease of poverty 0.98
be considered disease 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be considered disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(malaria, be considered disease)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(malaria, be considered disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(trachoma, disease of poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(trachoma, be considered disease of poverty)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(trachoma, be considered disease of poverty)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(trachoma, be considered disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(trachoma, be considered disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(trachoma, be considered disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(trachoma, be considered disease of poverty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(trachoma, be considered disease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(trachoma, be considered disease of poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trachoma, disease of poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(trachoma, disease of poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trachoma, disease of poverty)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(malaria, be considered disease)