tractor: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.71
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.71
, equipment
Weight: 0.63
, machine
Weight: 0.60
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings garbage truck
Weight: 0.67
, station wagon
Weight: 0.55
, harvester
Weight: 0.47
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.40
, truck
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tractor, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(machine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(machine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tractor, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tractor, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tractor, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tractor, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tractor, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tractor, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tractor, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tractor, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(machine, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tractor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(machine, has quality good)