trade: be in mexico

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.65
, change
Weight: 0.59
, tax
Weight: 0.59
, scheme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings auto mechanic
Weight: 0.63
, blacksmith
Weight: 0.61
, plumbing
Weight: 0.61
, machinist
Weight: 0.61
, welding
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mexico 1.00
be important to mexico 0.98
be in india 0.82
be with germany benefit houston 0.82
was with india profitable for british india compony 0.80
was with india profitable for british east india compony 0.80
was major part of boston york philadelphia 0.79
was major part of boston new york philadelphia 0.79
be bad for america 0.79
be important to canada 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(trade, be in mexico)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(trade, be important to canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trade, be bad for america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trade, was with india profitable for british east india compony)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(trade, was with india profitable for british east india compony)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(trade, be important to canada)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trade, be bad for america)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(trade, be important to canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(trade, was with india profitable for british east india compony)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(trade, be bad for america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(trade, was with india profitable for british east india compony)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(trade, be bad for america)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(trade, be important to canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(trade, be in mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(trade, be in mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trade, be in mexico)