trade: was important in ancient egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.65
, change
Weight: 0.59
, tax
Weight: 0.59
, scheme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings auto mechanic
Weight: 0.63
, blacksmith
Weight: 0.61
, plumbing
Weight: 0.61
, machinist
Weight: 0.61
, welding
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in ancient egypt 1.00
was important in ancient egypt for egyptians 0.99
was important in egypt 0.92
was important in egypt for egyptians 0.92
was important in ancient greece 0.92
was in ancient greece 0.90
be in egypt 0.88
was important in medieval japan 0.85
was important to egyptians 0.84
was important in greece 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt for egyptians)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(trade, was in ancient greece)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(trade, was important in ancient greece)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt for egyptians)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt for egyptians)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(trade, was in ancient greece)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt for egyptians)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(trade, was in ancient greece)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(trade, was in ancient greece)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trade, was important in ancient greece)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(trade, was important in ancient greece)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(trade, was important in medieval japan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(trade, was important to egyptians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(trade, was important to egyptians)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient greece)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(trade, was important to egyptians)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(trade, was important in medieval japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(trade, was important in medieval japan)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in medieval japan)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt)