trade: was important to egyptians

Property	Similarity
was important to egyptians	1.00
was important in egypt for egyptians	0.91
was important in ancient egypt for egyptians	0.89
was important in egypt	0.86
was important for athens	0.84
was important in ancient egypt	0.84
was important in greece	0.82
was important to ghana	0.81
was important in ancient greece	0.81
was important in rome	0.79

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt for egyptians)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(trade, was important for athens)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient egypt)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(trade, was important to ghana)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in ancient greece)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in rome)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt for egyptians)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(trade, was important for athens)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(trade, was important to ghana)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(trade, was important in ancient egypt)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(trade, was important in rome)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(trade, was important in ancient greece)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(trade, was important to ghana)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(trade, was important in rome)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(trade, was important for athens)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(trade, was important to ghana)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(trade, was important in ancient greece)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(trade, was important in ancient egypt for egyptians)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(trade, was important in rome)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(trade, was important in ancient greece)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(trade, was important for athens)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(trade, was important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(trade, was important in ancient egypt for egyptians)

Parents	deal Weight: 0.65 , change Weight: 0.59 , tax Weight: 0.59 , scheme Weight: 0.59
Siblings	auto mechanic Weight: 0.63 , blacksmith Weight: 0.61 , plumbing Weight: 0.61 , machinist Weight: 0.61 , welding Weight: 0.60

trade: was important to egyptians

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible