traffic cop: slow traffic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings traffic jam
Weight: 0.35
, stoplight
Weight: 0.32
, garbage truck
Weight: 0.32
, fast car
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
slow traffic 1.00
direct traffic 0.84
pass slow car 0.83
book speed motorist 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, slow traffic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fast car, pass slow car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(traffic jam, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(traffic jam, slow traffic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fast car, pass slow car)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast car, pass slow car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(traffic cop, slow traffic)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, direct traffic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(traffic cop, direct traffic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, book speed motorist)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(traffic cop, book speed motorist)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(traffic cop, direct traffic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(traffic cop, direct traffic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(traffic cop, book speed motorist)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(traffic cop, book speed motorist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, slow traffic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(traffic cop, slow traffic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(traffic jam, slow traffic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fast car, pass slow car)