traffic light: be blue in japan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents traffic
Weight: 0.83
, light
Weight: 0.76
, intersection
Weight: 0.70
, signal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red light
Weight: 0.78
, traffic jam
Weight: 0.41
, light source
Weight: 0.38
, light bulb
Weight: 0.38
, black light
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be blue in japan 1.00
flash green in canada 0.78
flash green in vancouver 0.77
be black in florida 0.77
be in texas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(traffic light, be blue in japan)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be black in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(traffic light, flash green in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(traffic light, be black in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(traffic light, flash green in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be black in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, flash green in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(traffic light, flash green in vancouver)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(traffic light, flash green in vancouver)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, flash green in vancouver)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(traffic light, be black in florida)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(traffic light, flash green in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(traffic light, flash green in vancouver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be blue in japan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be blue in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(traffic light, be blue in japan)