traffic light: be in vertical configuration in ontario

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents traffic
Weight: 0.83
, light
Weight: 0.76
, intersection
Weight: 0.70
, signal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red light
Weight: 0.78
, traffic jam
Weight: 0.41
, light source
Weight: 0.38
, light bulb
Weight: 0.38
, black light
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in vertical configuration in ontario 1.00
be in configuration in ontario 0.95
be vertical in ontario 0.94
be in vertical configuration 0.93
be in christmas tree vertical configuration 0.88
be in configuration 0.85
is vertical 0.85
be horizontal in florida 0.80
be horizontal in calgary 0.79
be horizontal in texas 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in christmas tree vertical configuration)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in christmas tree vertical configuration)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be in christmas tree vertical configuration)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in florida)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in christmas tree vertical configuration)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in calgary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in calgary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in calgary)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in florida)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in calgary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(traffic light, is vertical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)