traffic: be bad in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.61
, situation
Weight: 0.61
, stop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.83
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, air pollution
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in city 1.00
be bad in galway city 1.00
be in cebu city bad 0.92
be in city 0.92
be in city considered 0.86
be in cebu city 0.84
be bad in mexico city 0.82
be bad for us 0.78
be problem in cities 0.78
benefit economy in city 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be in city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, benefit economy in city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be in city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(air pollution, benefit economy in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(air pollution, benefit economy in city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in city)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(traffic, be in cebu city bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(traffic, be in cebu city bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be in cebu city bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(traffic, be in cebu city bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(traffic, be in city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(traffic, be in cebu city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be in cebu city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(traffic, be in cebu city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in mexico city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(traffic, be in city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in mexico city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(traffic, be in cebu city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(traffic, be in city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(traffic, be bad in mexico city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be in city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in mexico city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be problem in cities)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(traffic, be problem in cities)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(traffic, be problem in cities)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(traffic, be problem in cities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(air pollution, be in city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(air pollution, benefit economy in city)