traffic: be bad in delhi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.61
, situation
Weight: 0.61
, stop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.83
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, air pollution
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in delhi 1.00
be bad in new delhi 0.99
be in delhi 0.98
be bad in india 0.84
be bad in london 0.81
be problem in india 0.78
be bad in mexico city 0.77
be problem in york 0.76
be problem in new york 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be problem in new york)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be problem in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in delhi)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in new delhi)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in new delhi)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(traffic, be bad in new delhi)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in new delhi)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in mexico city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in mexico city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(traffic, be bad in mexico city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in mexico city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in delhi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in delhi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(air pollution, be problem in new york)