traffic: be in downtown atlanta

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.61
, situation
Weight: 0.61
, stop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.83
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, air pollution
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in downtown atlanta 1.00
be in atlanta 0.91
be in atlanta bad 0.89
be bad in nyc 0.81
be bad in seattle 0.78
be in seattle bad 0.78
be in seattle 0.78
be in chicago bad 0.78
be in chicago 0.77
be in austin 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in nyc)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in nyc)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(traffic, be bad in nyc)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(traffic, be in austin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in seattle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in seattle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(traffic, be in austin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(traffic, be bad in seattle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be in austin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in nyc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(traffic, be in austin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in seattle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(traffic, be in downtown atlanta)