traffic: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.61
, situation
Weight: 0.61
, stop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.83
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, air pollution
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
be bad for health 0.81
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad for us 0.80
affect water quality 0.78
be bad for human health 0.77
be bad for earth 0.76
be bad in city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(traffic, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(traffic, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stop, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(traffic, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality wrong)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(traffic, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(traffic, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stop, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(traffic, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(traffic light, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(traffic light, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for human health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(traffic, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(traffic, be bad in city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(traffic, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stop, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(stop, has quality wrong)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(stop, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(traffic light, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stop, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(stop, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(stop, has quality wrong)