traffic: is lights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.61
, situation
Weight: 0.61
, stop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.83
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, air pollution
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is lights 1.00
have lights 0.99
have blue lights 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(stop, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(traffic, is lights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(stop, is lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stop, is lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, have blue lights)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, have lights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(stop, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(traffic, is lights)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(traffic light, have lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(traffic light, have lights)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(traffic light, have blue lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(traffic light, have blue lights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(traffic, is lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(traffic, is lights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(traffic, is lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stop, is lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(traffic light, have lights)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(traffic light, have blue lights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(traffic, is lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stop, is lights)