train tracks: have gaps in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
have gaps in them 1.00
have gaps 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(train tracks, have gaps in them)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(train tracks, have gaps in them)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(train tracks, have gaps in them)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(train tracks, have gaps)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(train tracks, have gaps in them)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(train tracks, have gaps)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(train tracks, have gaps in them)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(train tracks, have gaps)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(train tracks, have gaps in them)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(train tracks, have gaps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(train tracks, have gaps in them)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(train tracks, have gaps in them)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(train tracks, have gaps in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(train tracks, have gaps in them)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(train tracks, have gaps in them)