train: be better than boats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.64
, transportation
Weight: 0.62
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, attraction
Weight: 0.59
, film
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bullet train
Weight: 0.79
, bus station
Weight: 0.35
, bus
Weight: 0.35
, station wagon
Weight: 0.34
, car accident
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than boats 1.00
be better than cars 0.85
be better than planes 0.83
be faster than cars 0.81
be better than bicycles 0.81
be more expensive than planes 0.80
go for longer than cars 0.80
be better than theatre 0.79
be better than buses 0.79
be more efficient than trucks 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(motor vehicle, be better than bicycles)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(train, be better than boats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(motor vehicle, be better than bicycles)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motor vehicle, be better than bicycles)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bus, be better than cars)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(motor vehicle, be better than bicycles)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(train, be better than boats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(bus, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bus, be better than cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(train, be better than boats)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(train, be more expensive than planes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(train, be more expensive than planes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(train, be more expensive than planes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than cars)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(train, be better than cars)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(train, be more expensive than planes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(train, be better than cars)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(train, be better than cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than boats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(train, be better than boats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(motor vehicle, be better than bicycles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bus, be better than cars)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(train, be better than boats)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(motor vehicle, be better than bicycles)