train: be more expensive than planes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.64
, transportation
Weight: 0.62
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, attraction
Weight: 0.59
, film
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bullet train
Weight: 0.79
, bus station
Weight: 0.35
, bus
Weight: 0.35
, station wagon
Weight: 0.34
, car accident
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than planes 1.00
cost more than planes 0.96
be better than planes 0.95
be more expensive than buses 0.85
is more expensive 0.85
be much cheaper than trains 0.83
be more expensive than bus 0.82
be more efficient than trucks 0.82
be better than cars 0.82
go for longer than cars 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bus, be better than cars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(bus, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bus, be better than cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(train, be more expensive than planes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(train, be more expensive than bus)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(train, be more expensive than bus)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(train, be more expensive than bus)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(train, be more expensive than bus)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than cars)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(train, be better than cars)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(train, be better than cars)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(train, be better than cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(train, be more expensive than planes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(train, be more expensive than planes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(train, be more expensive than planes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bus, be better than cars)