trainer: condition athelete

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings psychologist
Weight: 0.34
, lawyer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
condition athelete 1.00
condition athlete 0.92
condition boxer to perfection 0.78
condition racehorse 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(trainer, condition athelete)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(trainer, condition athlete)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(trainer, condition athlete)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(trainer, condition boxer to perfection)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(trainer, condition athlete)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(trainer, condition boxer to perfection)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(trainer, condition racehorse)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(trainer, condition racehorse)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(trainer, condition boxer to perfection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(trainer, condition athlete)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(trainer, condition racehorse)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trainer, condition racehorse)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trainer, condition boxer to perfection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(trainer, condition athelete)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(trainer, condition athelete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(trainer, condition athelete)