training: be for managers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents preparation
Weight: 0.68
, equipment
Weight: 0.64
, field
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.61
, exercise
Weight: 0.61
Siblings learning
Weight: 0.58
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.33
, fitness
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for managers 1.00
be for new employees 0.76
be for employees 0.76
be important for employees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(training, be for managers)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(training, be for new employees)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(training, be for employees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(training, be important for employees)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(training, be for employees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(training, be important for employees)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(training, be for new employees)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(training, be for employees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(training, be important for employees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(training, be for employees)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(training, be for new employees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(training, be important for employees)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(training, be for new employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(training, be for managers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(training, be for managers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(training, be for managers)