training: be for organisation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents preparation
Weight: 0.68
, equipment
Weight: 0.64
, field
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.61
, exercise
Weight: 0.61
Siblings learning
Weight: 0.58
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.33
, fitness
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for organisation 1.00
be in organisation 0.86
be to organisation 0.84
was at lackland 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(training, be for organisation)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(training, be in organisation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(training, be in organisation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(training, be in organisation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(training, be to organisation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(training, be to organisation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(training, was at lackland)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(training, be to organisation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(training, be in organisation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(training, be to organisation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(training, was at lackland)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(training, was at lackland)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(training, was at lackland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(training, be for organisation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(training, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(training, be for organisation)