training: be in organisation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents preparation
Weight: 0.68
, equipment
Weight: 0.64
, field
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.61
, exercise
Weight: 0.61
Siblings learning
Weight: 0.58
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.33
, fitness
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in organisation 1.00
be to organisation 0.88
be for organisation 0.86
was at lackland 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(training, be in organisation)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(training, be to organisation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(training, be for organisation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(training, was at lackland)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(training, be to organisation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(training, be to organisation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(training, was at lackland)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(training, be to organisation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(training, be for organisation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(training, was at lackland)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(training, be for organisation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(training, be for organisation)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(training, was at lackland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(training, be in organisation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(training, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(training, be in organisation)